COMING SOON · Q1 2027 Planned releaseGet notified + 10% launch offer ↗
Illustrative Acorn workspace for private forensic labs

For private laboratories and independent examiners

The client's question.
Your independent examination.

A connected workspace for civil disputes, employment investigations and independent review. Examine the material needed for the instruction and retain a clear route back to the source.

Explore the workflow

Planned release Q1 2027 · Explore the workflow and check build support.

A constructed commercial-data example in the Workbench: review a pricing table and tag the selected file while retaining its source and case context. View full screen
A constructed commercial-data example in the Workbench: review a pricing table and tag the selected file while retaining its source and case context.
Private forensic labs Sleuthy sector illustration

Private forensic labs

Spend the examination on the evidence

Private forensic work often begins with a narrow question: was a file copied, when did a document change, or does another report's interpretation fit the available records? A full processing run is not always the most useful first step.

Acorn is a forensic operating system with Workbench for case-based examination and focused apps for individual tasks. Evaluate it alongside your established laboratory methods: use the same preserved source, inspect the available records and compare a defined result. That establishes where it helps without requiring a wholesale change of tools.

Keep the tools your method needs

Use a focused application or a Workbench review for the question in hand. Retain specialist tools and independent checks where they add value, rather than treating a new platform as a replacement for every established method.

Pilot one complete instruction

Test intake, examination and handover on representative material. Check supported inputs, processing gaps and usable outputs, then record where another application or manual step is still needed.

Support independent review

Retain the records, source references and examiner notes behind each finding. Make it practical for a colleague to check the method and consider a competing explanation.

EXAMPLE WORKFLOW

Employment dispute: were client files copied before departure?

Example instruction: a solicitor asks a private laboratory to review an employee's returned laptop. The employer suspects that client documents were copied during the final working week.

  1. Set the scope with the instructing party

    Identify the relevant documents, dates and available device or account collections. Record any limits on personal material and keep the preservation and examination tasks distinct.

  2. Examine the activity around the files

    Review document content, file-system history and available access or transfer records. Compare the source records with an established method where appropriate, and investigate any difference rather than treating agreement as automatic proof.

  3. Prepare a reviewable explanation

    Distinguish a file's presence from evidence of access, copying or transfer. Retain the supporting records and identify any missing account or destination evidence that could test the conclusion.

Illustrative civil/employment instruction, not a client case. The Workbench screenshots show constructed commercial data. A folder name or cloud-service visit alone does not prove a transfer.

Actual Workbench stage outcomes for constructed training material. Missing and skipped capabilities remain visible rather than being presented as completed examination. View full screen
Actual Workbench stage outcomes for constructed training material. Missing and skipped capabilities remain visible rather than being presented as completed examination.

A useful evaluation

Bring the requirements that matter.

  • A representative civil or employment instruction
  • Existing tools, source formats and output requirements
  • A pilot with known results and acceptance criteria
  • Peer review, retention and client deliverables
Explore the focused applications ↗
Can we use Acorn for an independent report review?

Start with the proposition being checked and, where available, the underlying evidence rather than the report alone. Acorn can provide another route into supported records; the examiner still compares methods, coverage and interpretation.

Will it fit our existing laboratory tools?

Keep your existing tools and test a specific handover: source format, version, exported records and references. Working alongside another product does not mean its software runs inside Acorn or that its native case format can be imported.

How can it help with a tightly scoped civil instruction?

A focused app can inspect a particular database, document or artefact without starting a wider case review. Agree what the output needs to answer and when the available evidence calls for more work.

What should an evaluation cover?

Agree one representative instruction, known test material and acceptance criteria. Review coverage, repeatability, exports, examiner effort and peer review from start to finish. Record observed benefits and gaps before deciding where it fits.

The planned 2027 bundle

Take the workspace with you.

The proposed portable bundle pairs Acorn with a workstation, USB-C-powered screen, mini keyboard, mouse and carry bag.

Working specification: 24 GB RAM, AMD Ryzen 9 or Intel Core i9, and a 1 TB PCIe SSD. Final components and compatibility are still being selected.

Explore the planned bundle ↗

COMING SOON · Q1 2027

Target RRP under £3,000 GBP

Provisional specification and price target. Final VAT treatment, delivery, licence terms and availability will be confirmed before orders open.

Notify me + 10% launch offer ↗

No deposit or pre-order is taken here.

Start with your requirements

Discuss a private laboratory workflow

Bring one recurring instruction and the tools you already use. We can plan a workflow demonstration and the checks a useful pilot would need.

About the screenshots and illustrations

Application screens are selected from the September 2026 Acorn screenshot pack. Captions distinguish native setup views, constructed training records and public-corpus results. They are not private client cases, and a displayed control does not establish that every operation was completed.

Relevant public sources include DeepBlueCLI training event logs and Plaso test data. Check the relevant source terms before redistributing an underlying dataset.

Workspace scenes and sector mascot variants are generated illustrations. They do not show actual police, judicial, military or university deployments or endorsements. The original Squirrel Forensics identity is retained.

Zoom in, then scroll to inspect the detail.

Open full-resolution image ↗

A useful first conversation

Let’s look at your workflow.

Tell us what you examine, where you work and what you need to deliver.

Use the enquiry form to outline your role, intended use and potential order quantity. Do not send case material through a general enquiry.

Your enquiry goes to the SQFR team. Please do not include passwords or case evidence.